Anita Morris from the University of Melbourne, presented the findings of her PhD thesis.
What do we currently know about children experiencing family violence?
Undoubtedly it has a negative impact on children’s physical, emotional and psychological well-being but some children appear to have a certain level of resilience compared to others.
Anita’s research fills the gap in family violence research by bringing the voice of the children forward.
The study was based on the question ‘How is safety realised in the context of family violence?’
Anita scaled her participants on a scale from “Vulnerable and Unsafe” to “Safe”
Towards the vulnerable and unsafe end participants reported; forced or intrusive contact with the perpetrator, poverty, substance abuse, poor maternal physical earth, child sexual abuse, chronic mental health/trauma effects, limited informal supports and the role of formal interventions.
Some participants had positive experiences with interventions (relief etc) but for others it had caused unease or worry.
Key Finding: Mothers and children lacked agency for the above reasons.
What does agency mean?
Anita explored different aspects of agency through the interviews with participants and analytical theories.
She defined agency as, children being able to:
- Act for themselves,
- Seek and receive answers,
- Be aware of their roles in the family,
- Be able to make decisions about who they trust and have that respected,
- And, that they acknowledge they play a role in family resiliency.
Anita finished the presentation showing a variety of quotes selected from her interviews with mothers and children exposed to family violence, who provided a variety of complex insights into a very complex issue.
Read more about family violence and a book on the subject in a previous post.
Written by bloggers from SYN Media.